Vapor
Mediacom Communications, a cable television, internet, and phone service provider, filed a complaint against Everywhere Wireless, an internet service provider, on Wednesday in the Northern District of Illinois alleging that the defendant used Mediacom’s registered trademark to advertise a similar service, thus causing consumer confusion and deception.
According to the complaint, the action
seeks remedy for “counterfeiting, service mark infringement, false
advertising, false designation of origin, false representation of fact,
unfair competition, passing off and related claims” in violation of the
Lanham Act and Illinois statutory and law.
Mediacom asserted that
it has used the stylized GIGABIT+ mark in the U.S. in connection with
“its promotion and offering of Internet access services” long before
this lawsuit; they added that they have spent time and money to ensure
the exclusive association of the GIGABIT+ mark with Mediacom for
internet service.
The plaintiff alleged that after Mediacom
adopted, registered, and used the GIGABIT+ mark, the defendant has
provided and is providing internet access services using Mediacom’s mark
and designations. The plaintiff claimed that as shown in Exhibits C and
D, Everywhere Wireless used these stylized marks and designations on
its website, advertising similar services as Mediacom. Mediacom stated
that it informed Everywhere Wireless of its rights to the GIGABIT+ mark.
The complaint said the defendant then modified its designation “in
connection with the provision of Internet access services to residences
and businesses” from “Gigabit+” to “Gigabit Plus.”
Mediacom
claimed it informed Everywhere Wireless that the modified designation
still infringed its mark, and said the defendant did not respond to the
notice informing Everywhere Wireless of their continued infringement.
Mediacom
proffered that the defendant’s conduct was “willful, wanton, and in bad
faith, and with the intent to misrepresent the source of Defendant’s
services and to trade off of the reputation and goodwill of Mediacom.”
The
counts against the defendant include counterfeiting, infringement of
registered mark, service mark infringement, false advertising, false
designation of origin, false representation of fact, unfair competition
and passing off, deceptive trade practices. The defendant is accused of
violating the Lanham Act and various Illinois state laws.
Mediacom
has sought an injunction, an award for damages, an award for costs and
fees, for the defendant to deliver all items with the designations in
question or related designation for destruction, and other relief.
Mediacom is represented by Dentons US LLP.
Source:lawstreetmedia.com
Author:KIRSTEN ERRICK
Editor:Vapor