Vapor
South Korean battery makers LG Chem and SK Innovation are sparring again over an ongoing case regarding a violation of an electric battery patent.
On Sunday, the companies each released statements on the
status of their EV battery patent case being investigated by the US
International Trade Commission.
The case was filed by SK
Innovation last September, following LG Chem’s filing of a trade secret
misappropriation case against the company in April 2019.
It was
reported that LG Chem filed a motion with the ITC last month, seeking
the issuance of an order sanctioning SK Innovation for “destruction of
highly relevant evidence” after the litigation began.
LG Chem
said in the motion that SK Innovation destroyed documents related to the
EV battery patent with the intention of destroying relevant information
in their possession.
LG also claimed SK Innovation employees
were repeatedly instructed to “delete all materials related to the rival
company ... and delete this email after completing this directive.”
On
Friday, SK Innovation dismissed LG Chem‘s accusations, saying it “has
no reason whatsoever to delete the documents and it did not delete
them.”
SK also claimed the company solely developed the
pouch-type 994 patent being discussed in the latest tit-for-tat, unlike
LG’s assertion.
LG said SK could develop the 994 patent based on
LG’s A7 battery cell that was launched in 2013 prior to the 994 patent
being registered in 2015. The A7 battery cells were used in the Chrysler
Pacifica minivan in 2013.
“Once a patent is issued, the
technology is open to the public,” said SK in the Sunday statement.
“They would have known if the 994 patent violated its A7 technology by
the time we filed the complaint last year, which they didn’t even
recognize.”
They found some similarities between the two patents
two months after the complaint was filed, using the A7 technology in
particular to defend itself in the patent case, SK said.
However,
LG clarified that the company didn’t apply for a patent for the A7 cell
technology because it didn’t include high-level technological features
that had to be protected by patent application.
“SK should give
an answer to why it possessed LG’s information regarding the technology,
and why it attempted to destroy the documents,” LG said.
LG Chem
and SK Innovation have been in conflict over EV battery-related trade
secrets since last year, filing multiple lawsuits in the US and Korea.
In
February, the US ITC made a preliminary ruling in favor of LG Chem’s
argument that SK Innovation had misappropriated and used its EV battery
trade secrets.
The US trade panel is set to make its final ruling on the case in October.
Source: www.koreaherald.com
Author:Song Su-hyun
Editor:Vapor